← unifyweave.ai
Open Standard · Defensive Publication

FAS-26

Standard for Cryptographic Data Integrity
and Sovereign Audit

Version 1.0 (Initial Release) · April 2026
Author: David Krause, Dipl.-Wirtsch.-Ing. (FH)
Publisher: UnifyWeave™ Technologies
Classification: Public · Normative · Defensive Publication
📄
FAS-26 Core Specification V2.0
PDF · SHA-256 sealed · Public standard · Signed
Download PDF ↗

1 — Preamble: The Integrity Deficit

In modern digital and corporate ecosystems, a fundamental evidentiary asymmetry persists. Institutions — banks, insurers, cloud providers, public administrations — dictate truth through proprietary legacy systems, black-box algorithms, and opaque compliance processes. Individuals and small enterprises lack the tools to independently verify, document, and defend the integrity of their own data.

FAS-26 was developed to address this asymmetry. It defines a universal, process-oriented framework that transforms raw data into cryptographically verifiable, modular dossiers. The standard is industry-agnostic, jurisdiction-independent, and operates on the principle of Evidence-as-Code: evidentiary artifacts and commercial truths are treated like immutable source code — versioned, hashed, and independently verifiable.

FAS-26 does not replace existing legal or regulatory frameworks. It provides a technical layer that strengthens the evidentiary value of data within those frameworks.

2 — Scope

This standard applies to any process that transforms raw data into verifiable, stakeholder-facing dossiers — regardless of industry, legal jurisdiction, or data format.

FAS-26 is applicable to, but not limited to: forensic compliance audits, regulatory escalations, industrial cost accounting, financial reporting, identity verification, and cross-border documentation transfers.

3 — Normative References

StandardReference
eIDAS Regulation(EU) No. 910/2014 — Electronic identification and trust services
ISO 8601Date and time format
SHA-256NIST FIPS 180-4 — Secure Hash Standard
RFC 3227Guidelines for evidence collection and archiving
RFC 5322Internet Message Format (for EML-based evidence)
EU AI ActRegulation (EU) 2024/1689 — Artificial Intelligence Act

4 — Terms and Definitions

TermDefinition
AuditorThe natural or legal person executing the FAS-26 process. Assumes responsibility for dossier integrity and signs the Seal in Phase 5.
AuditReadyA conformity predicate confirming production through a complete FAS-26 5-Phase Loop with minimum Level 1 Seal.
DossierThe structured output of a complete FAS-26 process: MAD (Profile F) or IAD (Profile I).
Evidence-as-CodeThe governing paradigm. Evidentiary artifacts treated as immutable, versioned, and hashable data objects.
Ingest ArtifactA raw data object entering Phase 1, preserved in its original format without conversion.
MADModular Audit Dossier — output of FAS-26/F (forensic evidence with chain-of-custody).
IADIndustrial Audit Dossier — output of FAS-26/I (verified commercial calculations).
SealThe cryptographic closure applied in Phase 5. Three levels defined (Section 5.3).
Sovereign PerimeterThe isolated processing environment in which the FAS-26 process executes.

5 — The Four Axioms

The FAS-26 standard operates independently of industry and legal system, provided these four axioms are satisfied. A process that violates any axiom cannot claim FAS-26 conformity.

Axiom 1
Offline First (Zero-Trust Infrastructure)
Data integrity shall not be delegated to external cloud providers or third-party servers. The processing and sealing of data must occur within a Sovereign Perimeter controlled by the Auditor. Core functions shall not require any active external network connection at the time of execution.
Axiom 2
Non-Repudiation
The system must guarantee that neither the sender nor the recipient of information can subsequently deny the existence, content, or timestamp of a data transmission or document. Every output shall contain sufficient cryptographic and temporal metadata for independent verification.
Axiom 3
Graduated Seal Methodology
Every output must carry a verifiable Seal. Three Seal Levels with increasing evidentiary strength are defined.
L1
Minimum
SHA-256 hash of all dossier components + ISO 8601 timestamp (local clock)
L2
Recommended (F)
Level 1 + external timestamp (Timestamping Authority or verifiable deploy timestamp)
L3
Maximum
Level 2 + Qualified Electronic Signature (QES) per eIDAS Art. 3 No. 12
Axiom 4
Determinism
Identical input data, processed with identical configuration, must yield identical output — excluding timestamp and Seal metadata. AI components shall operate in inference mode with fixed weights and all AI-generated outputs shall be flagged and subject to human confirmation.

6 — The FAS-26 Core Architecture (5-Phase Loop)

Any process bearing the designation "FAS-26 Compliant" or "AuditReady" shall complete all five phases in sequence. No phase may be omitted.

Phase 1
INGEST
Raw data capture & isolation
Phase 2
AUDIT
Analytical deconstruction
Phase 3
TRANSITION
Profile assignment
Phase 4
ASSEMBLE
Modular synthesis
Phase 5
SEAL
Cryptographic closure

Phase 1: INGEST

The moment at which the primary source enters the FAS-26 process. Artifacts preserved in original format, each with an initial SHA-256 Base Hash. Phase concludes with a Completeness Confirmation documenting total number, format, and hashes of all ingested artifacts.

Phase 2: AUDIT

The engineering or forensic analysis phase. The Auditor isolates the discrepancy between target state and actual state. Output must contain at least one quantifiable metric. Analysis conducted without emotional or speculative assessment.

Phase 3: TRANSITION

The strategic routing phase. Profile assignment (F or I) determines dossier character. Profile F executes as WEAPONIZE (accountability identification). Profile I executes as VALIDATE (commercial verification).

Phase 4: ASSEMBLE

Construction of the final dossier from Phases 1–3. Must maintain unbroken reference chain from output back to each Ingest Artifact (chain of custody).

Phase 5: SEAL

Irreversible finalization. Master Hash (SHA-256) computed over all component hashes. After sealing, no component may be modified without breaking the Seal.

7 — Dual Manifestation: Profile F and Profile I

AttributeFAS-26/F (Forensic)FAS-26/I (Industrial)
DomainCompliance, fraud detection, regulatory escalation, litigationIndustrial controlling, cost accounting, B2B verification
Phase 3 ModeWEAPONIZE — accountability assignmentVALIDATE — commercial accuracy verification
Phase 3 OutputTarget Matrix (named individuals/institutions)Stakeholder Matrix (banks, auditors, authorities)
Dossier TypeMAD (Modular Audit Dossier)IAD (Industrial Audit Dossier)
Min. Seal LevelLevel 1 (Level 2–3 recommended)Level 1

8 — Minimum Dossier Requirements

#ComponentContentPhase
1Dossier HeaderProfile, rationale, case reference, Auditor identity, Seal Level, Master Hash, timestamp3 + 5
2Ingest DocumentationCompleteness Confirmation: number, format, Base Hash of each artifact1
3Audit ReportQuantified target-actual analysis with methodology disclosure2
4Integrity ManifestSHA-256 hash of every component. Master Hash over all. Seal Level proof.5

9 — Optional Modules

9.1 — CJP (Cross-Jurisdictional Protocol)

Governs transfer of dossier components across language boundaries. Translated documents use Bilingual Mirror format with SHA-256 link between original and translation. Translator qualification and translation type (sworn or technical) must be declared.

9.2 — SWO (Sworn Declaration Standard)

Defines the format for sworn declarations (eidesstattliche Versicherung / declaración jurada) within a FAS-26 dossier. Anchors the Auditor's personal accountability to factual statements. Must reference the specific dossier by Master Hash.

10 — Version Control

TypeNumberingScope
PatchV1.0.xTypographic corrections, clarifications. No normative change.
MinorV1.xNew optional modules, additional normative guidance. Backward compatible.
MajorVx.0Changes to axioms, phase definitions, or minimum requirements.

Each published version is sealed with SHA-256 and deposited at the canonical URI. The publication history ensures no retroactive modification can occur without detection.

Appendix A — Conformity Levels

LevelDesignationRequirements
CoreFAS-26 CompliantAll 4 axioms satisfied. All 5 phases completed. Minimum dossier requirements met. Seal Level 1+.
ProfileFAS-26/F or FAS-26/I CompliantCore conformity + adherence to respective Implementation Guide.
ProductAuditReadyFAS-26/I Profile conformity. Export pipeline completes full 5-Phase Loop automatically.

Appendix B — Phase Checklist (Normative)

PhaseMandatory Output
1 INGESTAll artifacts preserved in original format
Base Hash (SHA-256) generated per artifact
Completeness Confirmation documented
2 AUDITTarget-actual analysis with quantifiable metric(s)
No emotional/narrative assessment
AI usage disclosed and human-confirmed (if applicable)
3 TRANSITIONProfile (F or I) assigned with written rationale
Target Matrix (F) or Stakeholder Matrix (I) generated
4 ASSEMBLEDossier contains all 4 minimum components
Unbroken reference chain to Ingest Artifacts
5 SEALMaster Hash computed and declared
Seal Level declared in Dossier Header
Dossier deposited for stakeholder access